John Paul Powell
John Paul Powell's reviews only count toward the Tomatometer® when published at Tomatometer-approved publication(s).
Star Wars: Episode III - Revenge of the Sith (2005)
79%
3.5/5
EDIT
“Despite all of its impressive slam-bang, almost wall-to-wall action and awe-inspiring special effects, Episode III, though head and shoulders above the other prequels, is crippled by poor scripting and logic.” –
Jam! Movies
May 17, 2005
Full Review
Hulk (2003)
63%
3/5
EDIT
“An oddity as far as summer blockbusters go.” –
Jam! Movies
Jun 20, 2003
Full Review
Breakdown (1997)
83%
4/5
EDIT
“A well-crafted thriller.” –
Jam! Movies
May 7, 2003
Full Review
The Bourne Identity (2002)
84%
4/5
EDIT
“The Bourne Identity is a firm foundation for an espionage film franchise that could very well decommission Fleming's Bond or Tom Clancy's Jack Ryan.” –
Jam! Movies
Jun 14, 2002
Full Review
Star Wars: Episode II - Attack of the Clones (2002)
62%
2.5/5
EDIT
“With Clones, it is abundantly clear that the Force just isn't with [Lucas] any longer.” –
Jam! Movies
May 16, 2002
Full Review
Spider-Man (2002)
90%
5/5
EDIT
“A flat-out fun film.” –
Jam! Movies
May 3, 2002
Full Review
Planet of the Apes (2001)
42%
EDIT
“Adds a whole new dimension to the experience while keeping the essence of original intact.” –
Jam! Movies
Jul 27, 2001
Full Review
Batman & Robin (1997)
11%
EDIT
“Fans of the movie series will be shocked at the shortage of original thought put into this project.” –
Jam! Movies
Jul 24, 2001
Full Review
Jurassic Park III (2001)
49%
EDIT
“A complete and utter mess.” –
Jam! Movies
Jul 18, 2001
Full Review
A.I.: Artificial Intelligence (2001)
76%
EDIT
“It falters in trying to accomplish its primary objective and that is to make us feel for David Swinton.” –
Jam! Movies
Jun 29, 2001
Full Review
Swordfish (2001)
27%
EDIT
“Far better than your typical, predictable Hollywood shoot-em-up.” –
Jam! Movies
Jun 8, 2001
Full Review
Pearl Harbor (2001)
24%
EDIT
“The rationale behind the making of Pearl Harbor is so transparent it's embarrassing.” –
Jam! Movies
May 25, 2001
Full Review
Angel Eyes (2001)
32%
EDIT
“Mandoki and Di Pego take too long to get the motor running and by the time they do, we've run out of patience and hitched a ride home.” –
Jam! Movies
May 18, 2001
Full Review
The Mummy Returns (2001)
46%
EDIT
“Not only is The Mummy Returns bigger in scope than the fun-filled original, but it is better in every way imaginable.” –
Jam! Movies
May 4, 2001
Full Review
Vertical Limit (2000)
49%
EDIT
“One of the most stupid, contemptuous and hackneyed films of Y2K.” –
Jam! Movies
Dec 8, 2000
Full Review
Harriet the Spy (1996)
47%
EDIT
“Nick's methodology is way, way, outta synch with the spirit of Louise Fitzhugh's award-winning book.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Alien Resurrection (1997)
56%
EDIT
“Joss Whedon's atrocious script single-handedly gives the series a frontal lobotomy.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Chill Factor (1999)
10%
EDIT
“Anything and everything about Chill Factor is s--tty.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Apt Pupil (1998)
54%
EDIT
“King fans will be outraged denouncing the filmmakers as gutless flakes smothering the true horror of Apt Pupil so the film would be more acceptable to the general public.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
You've Got Mail (1998)
69%
EDIT
“Charmless and hokey!” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Small Soldiers (1998)
50%
4.5/5
EDIT
“The fantasy violence is fast and furious (dolls exploding, people cut and shot) however isn't depicted in a gory or graphic nature.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Casino (1995)
79%
10/10
EDIT
“” –
rec.arts.movies.reviews
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Halloween H20: 20 Years Later (1998)
54%
3/5
EDIT
“Halloween: H20 is substantially superior compared to any of the non-Carpenter follow-ups.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Godzilla 2000 (2000)
57%
EDIT
“You know, the it's-so-bad-it's-good idea. Guaranteed laughs and guaranteed fun to be had by all.” –
Jam! Movies
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
Balto (1995)
54%
7.5/10
EDIT
“” –
rec.arts.movies.reviews
Jan 1, 2000
Full Review
No Reviews Yet
Load More
Something went wrong.. try again